The Canadian Environmental Law Association published a new report that finds the design of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission’s (CNSC) regulatory process leaves significant public concerns unresolved when major licensing decisions are made and instead defers them to later processes with little or no public participation.
Public participation is central to nuclear regulation in Canada. This report asks whether that participation actually influences CNSC licensing decisions, or whether it mainly functions as a formal step in a process whose outcomes are already shaped by CNSC staff assessments and staged regulatory approval. By studying how the CNSC dealt with three licensing cases, at Darlington, Pickering, and Point Lepreau, the report shows that public concerns rarely shape the final licensing outcome.
This publication is found on the Canadian Environmental Law Archive website; click here to open it in a new tab.
Report: Acknowledged and Deferred: Intervenor Influence in CNSC Licensing Decisions
The Canadian Environmental Law Association published a new report that finds the design of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission’s (CNSC) regulatory process leaves significant public concerns unresolved when major licensing decisions are made and instead defers them to later processes with little or no public participation.
Public participation is central to nuclear regulation in Canada. This report asks whether that participation actually influences CNSC licensing decisions, or whether it mainly functions as a formal step in a process whose outcomes are already shaped by CNSC staff assessments and staged regulatory approval. By studying how the CNSC dealt with three licensing cases, at Darlington, Pickering, and Point Lepreau, the report shows that public concerns rarely shape the final licensing outcome.
This publication is found on the Canadian Environmental Law Archive website; click here to open it in a new tab.
Share: