CELA Foundation
Intake Form
CELA Newsletter
Facebook-f
Instagram
Youtube
Linkedin
Mail-bulk
Search
Make a Donation
Search
Home
Who We Are
About Us
Our Mandate
Commitment to Truth and Reconciliation
CELA Values Statement
Canadian Environmental Law Foundation
Resource Library
Environmental History Program
CELA Archives
Donate
Our Board
Our Staff
Annual Reports
Partners
Working at CELA
Contact Us
Legal Services
Legal Representation and Advice
Referrals
Casework
Intake Form
Legal Education and Engagement
Publications
Newsletter
Blog
Presentations & Webinars
Law Reform and Initiatives
Action Alerts
Law Reform Campaigns
Get Involved
Newsletter
Upcoming Events
Latest News
Media Releases
Blog
Newsletter
Contact
Home
Who We Are
About Us
Our Mandate
Commitment to Truth and Reconciliation
CELA Values Statement
Canadian Environmental Law Foundation
Resource Library
Environmental History Program
CELA Archives
Donate
Our Board
Our Staff
Annual Reports
Partners
Working at CELA
Contact Us
Legal Services
Legal Representation and Advice
Referrals
Casework
Intake Form
Legal Education and Engagement
Publications
Newsletter
Blog
Presentations & Webinars
Law Reform and Initiatives
Action Alerts
Law Reform Campaigns
Get Involved
Newsletter
Upcoming Events
Latest News
Media Releases
Blog
Newsletter
Contact
Respondents Factum to Ontario Court of Appeal (Lafarge)
September 11, 2008
Casework
,
Publications
air pollution
,
cumulative effects
,
Divisional Court
,
Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR)
,
Environmental Protection Act (EPA)
,
Ontario Court of Appeal
,
precautionary principle
,
public participation
Title:
Respondents Factum to Ontario Court of Appeal (Lafarge)
Resource Type:
Legal Submissions
Content:
LOW-On-Ct-Appeal-factum
# of Pages:
26
Date authored:
September 11, 2008
Author/s:
Richard D. Lindgren, Counsel for the Respondents Lake Ontario Waterkeeper and Gordon Downie
Share:
Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Facebook
Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
LinkedIn
Prev
Previous Post
Final Assessments and Proposed Management Options for Batch 1 Substances, Industry Challenge, CMP
Next Post
Binational Toxics Strategy (BTS)
Next
Respondents Factum to Ontario Court of Appeal (Lafarge)
Share: